BAL Lazio

HTA

HTA – Risorse

Pubblicato lunedì 5 Maggio 2014

Risorse generali e reti internazionali

European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUNETHTA)
Health Technology Assessment Database (Cochrane)
Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi)
International Information Network on New and Emerging Health Technologies (EuroScan)
International Network of Agencies of Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA)

EUROPA

Italia
Agenzia nazionale per i servizi sanitari regionali (Age.Na.S.)
Società Italiana di Health Technology Assessment (SIHTA)

Austria
Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment (LBI of HTA)

Belgio
Belgian Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)

Danimarca
Danish Institute for Health Services Research (DSI)

Finlandia
Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (FinOHTA)

Francia
Comité d´Evaluation et de Diffusion des Innovations Technologiques (CEDIT)
Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)

Germania
German Agency for HTA at the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information (DAHTA @DIMDI)
Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)

Lettonia
Health Statistics and Medical Technologies State Agency (VSMTVA)

Lituania
State Health Care Accreditation Agency under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Lithuania (VASPVT)

Norvegia
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC)

Paesi Bassi
Gezondheidsraad (GR)
The Medical and Health Research Council of The Netherlands (ZonMw)

Polonia
Agency for Health Technology Assessment in Poland (AHTAPol)

Regno Unito
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD)
Institute of Applied Health Sciences (IAHS)
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme
Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS)

Spagna
Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologias Sanitarias (AETS)
Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)
Galician Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AVALIA-T)
Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research (CAHTA)
Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment (OSTEBA)

Svezia
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU)

Svizzera
Medical Technology Unit – Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (MTU-SFOPH)

RESTO DEL MONDO

Argentina
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS)

Australia
Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA)
Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC)

Brasile
Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (DECIT-CGATS)

Canada
Agence d´Évaluation des Technologies et des Modes d´Intervention en Santé (AETMIS)
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
Institute of Health Economics (IHE)

Malesia
Health Technology Assessment Section, Ministry of Health Malaysia (MaHTAS)

Messico
Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC)

Nuova Zelanda
Health Services Assessment Collaboration (HSAC)

Taiwan
Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE)

USA
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Archiviato in ,

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

Accedi agli articoli

Corder K et al. Becoming a parent: A systematic review and meta-analysis of changes in BMI, diet, and physical activity. Obes Rev 2020 Jan 19. doi: 10.1111/obr.12959. [Epub ahead of print]

Winpenny EM et al. Changes in physical activity, diet, and body weight across the education and employment transitions of early adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2020 Jan 19. doi: 10.1111/obr.12962. [Epub ahead of print]

Fralick M et al. Assessing the risk for gout with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020 Jan 14. doi: 10.7326/M19-2610. [Epub ahead of print]

Fabbri A et al. Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;368:l6925.

Malta M et al. Opioid-related treatment, interventions, and outcomes among incarcerated persons: A systematic review. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1003002.

Fazel S, Yoon IA, Hayes AJ. Substance use disorders in prisoners: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis in recently incarcerated men and women. Addiction 2017;112:1725-39. pmid:28543749

Kimura S et al. Impact of gender on chemotherapeutic response and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy and perioperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec 5. pii: S1558-7673(19)30358-1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.007. [Epub ahead of print]

Gupta S et al. AGA clinical practice guidelines on management of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Gastroenterology. 2019 Dec 3. pii: S0016-5085(19)41888-X. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.003. [Epub ahead of print]

Ahlqvist VH et al. Elective and nonelective cesarean section and obesity among young adult male offspring: A Swedish population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2019 Dec 6;16(12):e1002996.

Risal S et al. Prenatal androgen exposure and transgenerational susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Med 2019; 25(12):1894-1904.

Una finestra sull’open access

  • BMC Family Practice
  • BMC Medical Education
  • BMC Nursing
  • BMJ Open
  • PLOS Medicine

Reset della password

Per favore inserisci la tua email. Riceverai una nuova password via email.