BAL Lazio

Notizie

Revisioni sistematiche in primo piano

Pubblicato venerdì 28 Novembre 2014

Sul numero di dicembre del Journal of Clinical Epidemiology una serie di articoli metodologici sulla necessità di aggiornamento delle linee guida e delle revisioni sistematiche, sulle priorità dei temi presi in esame dalle revisioni e sulla possibilità di confrontare gli effetti di un trattamento su diverse patologie per individuare eventuali effetti inattesi.

Come si legge nell’editoriale “le revisioni sistematiche sono ampiamente riconosciute come il fondamento di una buona assistenza sanitaria, per cui la loro qualità, validità e credibilità sono cruciali per i pazienti, i professionisti e la società”.

Gli articoli liberamente accessibili:
J Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P. Knowledge synthesis to improve practice requires up-to-date definitions, content, methods, and techniques. J Clin Epidemiol 2014, 67 (12): 1289–1290.
Pieper D, Antoine S, Neugebauer EAM, Eikermann M. Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2014, 67 (12): 1302–1308.
Chen Y, Hemming K, Chilton PJ, Gupta KV, Altman DG, Lilford RJ. Scientific hypotheses can be tested by comparing the effects of one treatment over many diseases in a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2014, 67 (12): 1309–1319.
Agbassi C, Messersmith H, McNair S, Brouwers M. Priority-based initiative for updating existing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: the results of two iterations. J Clin Epidemiol 2014, 67 (12): 1335–1342.

 

 

Tagged ,

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato.

Accedi agli articoli

Dehmer SP et al. Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer: a decision analysis: technical report [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 15-05229-EF-1.

Ezekowitz JA et al.; SODIUM-HF Investigators. Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2022:S0140-6736(22)00369-5.

Fang Z et al. The role of mendelian randomization studies in deciphering the effect of obesity on cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2022; 114 (3); 361-71.

Wong Chung JERE et al. Time to functional recovery after laser tonsillotomy performed under local anesthesia vs conventional tonsillectomy with general anesthesia among adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(2):e2148655. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148655.

Sundbøll J. Risk of parkinson disease and secondary parkinsonism in myocardial infarction survivors. Journal of the American Heart Association 2022; doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022768

Ferroni E et al. Gender related differences in gastrointestinal bleeding with oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2022;27:10742484211054609.

Lowenstein M et al. Sustained implementation of a multicomponent strategy to increase emergency department-initiated interventions for opioid use disorder. Ann Emerg Med 2021:S0196-0644(21)01380-9.

Okereke OI et al. Effect of long-term supplementation with marine omega-3 fatty acids vs placebo on risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms and on change in mood scores: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326(23):2385-2394.

Gaillard EA et al. European Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in children aged 5-16 years. Eur Respir J 2021;58(5):2004173.

Slomski A. Thousands of US youths cope with the trauma of losing parents to COVID-19. JAMA. Published online November 17, 2021.

Hillis SD, Blenkinsop A, Villaveces A, et al. COVID-19-associated orphanhood and caregiver death in the United States. Pediatrics. 2021 Oct 7:e2021053760.

Una finestra sull’open access

  • BMC Family Practice
  • BMC Medical Education
  • BMC Nursing
  • BMJ Open
  • PLOS Medicine